Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Blend Labs, Inc.
How Blend Labs, Inc. stacks up
BLND · against 385 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
67/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #77 of 386 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score30 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including BLND · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 89% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -10.0% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BLND, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BLND | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 396 reported | 6.6% | 3.5% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 203 reported | Not reported | 1.7% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | -10.0% | 1.0% | 16% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BLND| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5B CNY (≈$344M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 3.4B CNY (≈$482M) | 99 | 91 | |
| 1 | 218M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 4 | 67.2B JPY (≈$457M) | 98 | 92 | |
| 4 | 287M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 74 | 14.2B TWD (≈$439M) | 68 | 51 | |
| 74 | 77.4B JPY (≈$526M) | 68 | 69 | |
| 77 | 17.0B TWD (≈$528M) | 67 | 71 | |
| 77 | 12.8B TWD (≈$396M) | 67 | 45 | |
| 77 | 274M USD | 67 | 27 | |
| 77 | 499M SGD (≈$380M) | 67 | 65 | |
| 81 | 2.6B CNY (≈$361M) | 66 | 37 | |
| 82 | 201.1B KRW (≈$145M) | 65 | 49 | |
| 82 | 13.6B TWD (≈$421M) | 65 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score