Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
How Bloomin' Brands, Inc. stacks up
BLMN · against 590 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
74/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #157 of 591 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score61 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including BLMN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 86% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 17.7% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BLMN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BLMN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 585 reported | 3.2% | 4.0% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 603 reported | 11.6% | 8.8% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 159 reported | 17.7% | 7.4% | 82% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 587 reported | 49.3% | 60.5% | 40% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BLMN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 3.9B HKD (≈$498M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 4.1B HKD (≈$522M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 157 | 4.1B CNY (≈$581M) | 74 | 65 | |
| 157 | 105.6B JPY (≈$718M) | 74 | 55 | |
| 157 | 123.4B JPY (≈$839M) | 74 | 64 | |
| 157 | 6.7B BRL (≈$1.2B) | 74 | 80 | |
| 157 | 876M USD | 74 | 44 | |
| 157 | 454M USD | 74 | 45 | |
| 157 | 423M EUR (≈$465M) | 74 | 66 | |
| 165 | 4.6B CNY (≈$647M) | 73 | 44 | |
| 165 | 3.8B CNY (≈$531M) | 73 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score