Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bausch + Lomb Corporation
How Bausch + Lomb Corporation stacks up
BLCO · against 184 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
57/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #95 of 185 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score28 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including BLCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.9% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BLCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BLCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 185 reported | 8.9% | 9.4% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 127 reported | Not reported | 11.7% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 10.9% | 9.5% | 54% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BLCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 2 | 3.8B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 5 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 88 | 12.6B USD | 59 | 55 | |
| 92 | 13.3B USD | 58 | 59 | |
| 92 | 5.0B USD | 58 | 60 | |
| 92 | 10.9B EUR (≈$11.9B) | 58 | 59 | |
| 95 | 7.2B USD | 57 | 43 | |
| 95 | 11.6B USD | 57 | 56 | |
| 95 | 12.6B EUR (≈$13.9B) | 57 | 73 | |
| 98 | 5.8B USD | 56 | 38 | |
| 98 | 62.5B SEK (≈$6.3B) | 56 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score