Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Black Hills Corporation
How Black Hills Corporation stacks up
BKH · against 84 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #54 of 85 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including BKH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -4.9% vs peer median 0.0%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.9% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.8% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BKH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BKH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 84 reported | 4.8% | 5.4% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 85 reported | 7.8% | 8.7% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | -4.9% | -0.7% | 29% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 78 reported | 62.9% | 58.5% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BKH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 1 | 8.54T CLP (≈$9.4B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 6.9B GBP (≈$9.0B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 45.8B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 4 | 4.84T CLP (≈$5.3B) | 94 | 72 | |
| 49 | 10.1B USD | 46 | 46 | |
| 51 | 36.1B CNY (≈$5.1B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 52 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 43 | 69 | |
| 52 | 9.4B NZD (≈$5.6B) | 43 | 69 | |
| 54 | 6.3B USD | 42 | 38 | |
| 54 | 4.1B USD | 42 | 43 | |
| 56 | 6.4B USD | 41 | 45 | |
| 57 | 5.4B USD | 38 | 77 | |
| 58 | 4.6B EUR (≈$5.0B) | 37 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score