Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BJ · against 87 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #28 of 88 · scores higher than 69% of peers · safety percentile 58
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including BJ · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker current ratio and debt / equity than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BJ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 87 reported | 1.26× | 0.59× | 23% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 85 reported | 0.17 | 0.33 | 82% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 82 reported | 0.73× | 1.28× | 11% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 2 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 4 | 55.6B CNY (≈$7.8B) | 83 | 57 | |
| 5 | 118.9B CNY (≈$16.7B) | 83 | 61 | |
| 24 | 41.5B SAR (≈$11.2B) | 63 | 61 | |
| 25 | 849.3B INR (≈$10.2B) | 62 | 56 | |
| 26 | 13.9B NZD (≈$8.4B) | 60 | 75 | |
| 27 | 80.7B CNY (≈$11.3B) | 59 | 56 | |
| 28 | 13.8B USD | 58 | 59 | |
| 29 | 1.19T INR (≈$14.2B) | 57 | 60 | |
| 30 | 115.4B NOK (≈$11.0B) | 57 | 56 | |
| 31 | 94.2B NOK (≈$9.0B) | 57 | 63 | |
| 32 | 7.6B EUR (≈$8.4B) | 55 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score