Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
How Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation stacks up
BIPC · against 94 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #38 of 95 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including BIPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -7.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.2% vs peer median 8.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 93% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 21.5% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BIPC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BIPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 94 reported | -7.6% | 5.4% | 3% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 95 reported | 14.2% | 9.2% | 85% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 48 reported | 21.5% | -0.7% | 98% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 89 reported | -33.3% | 64.8% | 0% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BIPC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 2 | 6.9B GBP (≈$9.0B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 45.8B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 3 | 4.84T CLP (≈$5.3B) | 94 | 72 | |
| 5 | 48.0B BRL (≈$8.6B) | 92 | 76 | |
| 33 | 319.4B INR (≈$3.8B) | 70 | 63 | |
| 35 | 17.9B BRL (≈$3.2B) | 69 | 75 | |
| 35 | 5.3B EUR (≈$5.9B) | 69 | 45 | |
| 37 | 25.5B CNY (≈$3.6B) | 68 | 70 | |
| 38 | 4.6B USD | 66 | 59 | |
| 39 | 2.70T CLP (≈$3.0B) | 65 | 59 | |
| 40 | 44.2B CNY (≈$6.2B) | 63 | 51 | |
| 41 | 7.6B USD | 60 | 46 | |
| 42 | 5.3B USD | 59 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score