Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BHE · against 440 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #233 of 441 · scores higher than 47% of peers · safety percentile 48
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including BHE · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BHE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 428 reported | 0.26× | 0.26× | 50% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 425 reported | 1.26 | 0.91 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 436 reported | 1.99× | 1.89× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 229 | 4.8B USD | 48 | 56 | |
| 230 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 48 | 58 | |
| 231 | 103.2B TWD (≈$3.2B) | 48 | 63 | |
| 232 | 69.0B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 48 | 65 | |
| 233 | 2.5B USD | 48 | 51 | |
| 234 | 9.5B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 48 | 46 | |
| 235 | 14.7B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 47 | 35 | |
| 236 | 55.0B TWD (≈$1.7B) | 47 | 52 | |
| 237 | 28.4B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 47 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score