Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Biglari Holdings Inc.
How Biglari Holdings Inc. stacks up
BH · against 511 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
78/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #106 of 512 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score56 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including BH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.1% vs peer median 4.4%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 93% of peers. EBITDA yield: 23.9% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 508 reported | -6.1% | 4.7% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 522 reported | 23.9% | 9.0% | 94% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 142 reported | 4.2% | 6.9% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 508 reported | 233.0% | 58.5% | 97% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 4.6B HKD (≈$593M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 106 | 6.0B CNY (≈$845M) | 78 | 60 | |
| 106 | 9.1B HKD (≈$1.2B) | 78 | 77 | |
| 106 | 250.0B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 78 | 64 | |
| 106 | 104.7B JPY (≈$712M) | 78 | 61 | |
| 106 | 1.2B USD | 78 | 54 | |
| 106 | 28.4B TRY (≈$852M) | 78 | 59 | |
| 106 | 718M GBP (≈$934M) | 78 | 68 | |
| 113 | 5.0B CNY (≈$699M) | 77 | 60 | |
| 113 | 15.3B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 77 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score