Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to B&G Foods, Inc.
How B&G Foods, Inc. stacks up
BGS · against 161 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #77 of 162 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including BGS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -36.5% vs peer median 4.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.9% vs peer median 8.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 32.9% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BGS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 150 reported | -36.8% | 4.7% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 168 reported | 11.9% | 10.4% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 71 reported | 32.9% | 6.6% | 94% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 155 reported | 203.4% | 86.7% | 84% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BGS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1.4B HKD (≈$177M) | 98 | 83 | |
| 3 | 847M HKD (≈$108M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 3 | 1.7B HKD (≈$218M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 73 | 10.5B INR (≈$126M) | 64 | 47 | |
| 75 | 39.0B JPY (≈$265M) | 62 | 70 | |
| 75 | 6.5B TWD (≈$201M) | 62 | 69 | |
| 77 | 50.7B JPY (≈$345M) | 61 | 59 | |
| 77 | 194M USD | 61 | 26 | |
| 79 | 282M EUR (≈$310M) | 60 | 37 | |
| 80 | 1.4B BRL (≈$244M) | 59 | 33 | |
| 81 | 393.7B KRW (≈$283M) | 58 | 60 | |
| 81 | 2.8B HKD (≈$353M) | 58 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score