Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Saul Centers, Inc.
How Saul Centers, Inc. stacks up
BFS · against 228 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
78/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #48 of 229 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score29 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including BFS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.1% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BFS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BFS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 248 reported | 3.4% | 5.8% | 37% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 225 reported | 6.8% | 5.6% | 67% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 93 reported | 10.3% | 7.8% | 64% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 251 reported | 15.6% | 116.9% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BFS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 12.33T IDR (≈$764M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 5 | 139.5B JPY (≈$949M) | 97 | 81 | |
| 44 | 6.4B SAR (≈$1.7B) | 82 | 61 | |
| 44 | 1.2B CAD (≈$856M) | 82 | 51 | |
| 46 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 81 | 79 | |
| 47 | 30.2B THB (≈$846M) | 79 | 54 | |
| 48 | 996M USD | 78 | 53 | |
| 48 | 930M AUD (≈$614M) | 78 | 46 | |
| 48 | 1.2B AUD (≈$811M) | 78 | 47 | |
| 48 | 7.9B SEK (≈$795M) | 78 | 56 | |
| 52 | 3.3B SAR (≈$901M) | 77 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score