Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.
How Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. stacks up
BFAM · against 378 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #150 of 379 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score52 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including BFAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 65% of peers. Return on assets: 4.6% vs peer median 3.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 69% of peers. Operating margin: 10.3% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 73% of peers. Return on invested capital: 13.2% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BFAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BFAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 358 reported | 13.2% | 9.4% | 71% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 378 reported | 10.3% | 8.7% | 64% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 360 reported | 4.6% | 4.1% | 58% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 344 reported | 14.9% | 10.8% | 72% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 382 reported | 25.5% | 31.8% | 40% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BFAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 393.5B INR (≈$4.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 146 | 1.9B USD | 68 | 55 | |
| 146 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 68 | 49 | |
| 150 | 480.8B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 67 | 75 | |
| 150 | 10.2B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 67 | 57 | |
| 150 | 2.6B USD | 67 | 54 | |
| 150 | 2.6B EUR (≈$2.9B) | 67 | 63 | |
| 150 | 77.2B THB (≈$2.2B) | 67 | 64 | |
| 155 | 18.1B HKD (≈$2.3B) | 66 | 54 | |
| 155 | 2.5B USD | 66 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score