Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BEN · against 48 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #18 of 49 · scores higher than 65% of peers · safety percentile 60
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including BEN · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 47 reported | 0.25× | 0.64× | 70% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 49 reported | 1.58 | 0.94 | 8% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 39 reported | 5.49× | 1.90× | 84% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.6B USD | 95 | 73 | |
| 2 | 1.01T INR (≈$12.2B) | 94 | 84 | |
| 3 | 1.42T INR (≈$17.0B) | 94 | 69 | |
| 4 | 1.05T INR (≈$12.6B) | 91 | ||
| 5 | 9.8B EUR (≈$10.7B) | 90 | 56 | |
| 14 | 21.7B SGD (≈$16.5B) | 68 | 61 | |
| 15 | 19.0B CAD (≈$13.9B) | 68 | 60 | |
| 16 | 14.1B USD | 67 | 57 | |
| 17 | 13.1B AUD (≈$8.6B) | 66 | 55 | |
| 18 | 16.4B USD | 60 | 54 | |
| 19 | 9.1B EUR (≈$10.0B) | 58 | 32 | |
| 20 | 31.1B USD | 56 | 65 | |
| 21 | 15.3B EUR (≈$16.8B) | 56 | 57 | |
| 22 | 226.5B SEK (≈$22.7B) | 55 | 87 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score