Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Franklin Templeton Inc.
How Franklin Templeton Inc. stacks up
BEN · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #29 of 154 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including BEN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.9% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 157.5% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BEN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 7.9% | 10.5% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 157.5% | 11.4% | 92% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 6.1% | 11.5% | 28% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BEN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 25 | 4.3B USD | 86 | 62 | |
| 25 | 1.4B USD | 86 | 58 | |
| 27 | 3.1B USD | 85 | 63 | |
| 27 | 659M USD | 85 | 72 | |
| 29 | 16.4B USD | 84 | 54 | |
| 29 | 2.5B USD | 84 | 56 | |
| 29 | 88.7B USD | 84 | 39 | |
| 32 | 15.9B USD | 83 | 53 | |
| 32 | 498M USD | 83 | 90 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score