Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bel Fuse Inc.
How Bel Fuse Inc. stacks up
BELFA · against 433 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #192 of 434 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including BELFA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.1% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.6% vs peer median 2.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BELFA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BELFA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 428 reported | 2.1% | 2.4% | 47% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 439 reported | 5.7% | 4.5% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 172 reported | 2.6% | 3.4% | 44% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 32.8% | 29.8% | 56% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BELFA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 188 | 3.8B USD | 54 | 74 | |
| 192 | 15.6B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 53 | 52 | |
| 192 | 7.9B MYR (≈$1.7B) | 53 | 63 | |
| 192 | 55.0B TWD (≈$1.7B) | 53 | 52 | |
| 192 | 2.8B USD | 53 | 70 | |
| 192 | 2.7B USD | 53 | 53 | |
| 197 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 52 | 44 | |
| 197 | 14.0B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 52 | 58 | |
| 197 | 122.9B TWD (≈$3.8B) | 52 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score