Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BEAM · against 348 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #49 of 349 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)30 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including BEAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BEAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 336 reported | 0.23× | 0.23× | 50% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 334 reported | 2.20 | 0.56 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 335 reported | 14.57× | 2.82× | 92% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.8B USD | 99 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 45 | 25.3B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 87 | 68 | |
| 46 | 3.9B USD | 87 | 47 | |
| 47 | 2.2B USD | 86 | 35 | |
| 48 | 3.4B USD | 86 | 35 | |
| 49 | 2.7B USD | 86 | 50 | |
| 50 | 1.8B USD | 86 | 80 | |
| 51 | 26.9B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 86 | 65 | |
| 52 | 1.7B USD | 86 | 30 | |
| 53 | 2.05T KRW (≈$1.5B) | 86 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score