Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Becton, Dickinson and Company
How Becton, Dickinson and Company stacks up
BDX · against 57 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #38 of 58 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including BDX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Healthcare peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 86% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -37.5% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.7% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 76% of peers. Revenue growth: 18.5% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BDX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BDX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 58 reported | 18.5% | 9.6% | 86% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 47 reported | -37.5% | 12.7% | 7% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 58 reported | 5.7% | 6.6% | 44% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BDX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.7B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 3 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 4 | 43.30T KRW (≈$31.2B) | 86 | 68 | |
| 4 | 56.0B USD | 86 | 39 | |
| 34 | 27.3B USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 35 | 43.2B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 36 | 100.2B USD | 49 | 68 | |
| 37 | 49.5B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 38 | 54.0B USD | 45 | 47 | |
| 38 | 89.7B USD | 45 | 50 | |
| 38 | 34.0B USD | 45 | 49 | |
| 41 | 11.26T JPY (≈$76.6B) | 44 | 72 | |
| 41 | 84.5B EUR (≈$92.9B) | 44 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score