Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Brandywine Realty Trust
How Brandywine Realty Trust stacks up
BDN · against 226 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #110 of 227 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score16 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including BDN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield and free cash flow yield than most Real Estate peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -27.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.4% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.3% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BDN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BDN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 246 reported | -27.2% | 5.5% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 228 reported | 6.3% | 5.5% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 83 reported | 1.4% | 9.2% | 22% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 250 reported | 131.1% | 117.1% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BDN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 106 | 1.1B NZD (≈$669M) | 56 | 62 | |
| 107 | 129.6B JPY (≈$882M) | 55 | 60 | |
| 107 | 22.9B INR (≈$275M) | 55 | 62 | |
| 107 | 18.8B THB (≈$527M) | 55 | 68 | |
| 110 | 522M USD | 54 | 30 | |
| 110 | 430M USD | 54 | 34 | |
| 110 | 338M EUR (≈$371M) | 54 | 53 | |
| 110 | 591M EUR (≈$650M) | 54 | 62 | |
| 114 | 3.9B SEK (≈$386M) | 53 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score