Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BDC · against 362 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #275 of 363 · scores higher than 24% of peers · safety percentile 24
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)38 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including BDC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BDC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 348 reported | 0.97× | 0.30× | 15% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 348 reported | 1.13 | 1.01 | 41% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 359 reported | 2.13× | 1.85× | 58% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 5 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 271 | 4.2B USD | 25 | 48 | |
| 272 | 38.9B CNY (≈$5.4B) | 25 | 48 | |
| 273 | 33.8B CNY (≈$4.7B) | 25 | 39 | |
| 274 | 24.4B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 25 | 14 | |
| 275 | 4.2B USD | 24 | 54 | |
| 276 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 24 | 47 | |
| 277 | 21.8B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 24 | 39 | |
| 278 | 217.4B TWD (≈$6.7B) | 23 | 34 | |
| 279 | 4.3B USD | 23 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score