Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BCYC · against 328 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #61 of 329 · scores higher than 82% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)41 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including BCYC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BCYC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 297 reported | 0.03× | 0.19× | 78% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 314 reported | 1.68 | 0.49 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 323 reported | 12.08× | 3.04× | 86% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 3 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 4 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 5 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 57 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 87 | 51 | |
| 58 | 38.3B JPY (≈$260M) | 87 | 76 | |
| 59 | 299M USD | 86 | 38 | |
| 60 | 6.5B TWD (≈$200M) | 86 | 76 | |
| 61 | 257M USD | 86 | 55 | |
| 62 | 142M USD | 85 | 45 | |
| 63 | 30.4B JPY (≈$206M) | 85 | 57 | |
| 64 | 11.6B TWD (≈$360M) | 85 | 45 | |
| 65 | 170M USD | 84 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score