Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bicycle Therapeutics plc
How Bicycle Therapeutics plc stacks up
BCYC · against 316 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
7/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #287 of 317 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score43 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including BCYC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 7?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on invested capital: -81840.9% vs peer median 4.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 92% of peers. Operating margin: -343.6% vs peer median 7.1%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 87% of peers. Return on assets: -31.4% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BCYC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BCYC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 279 reported | -81840.9% | -0.8% | 0% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 296 reported | -343.6% | 2.0% | 11% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 317 reported | -31.4% | -0.5% | 17% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 296 reported | -32.3% | -0.8% | 26% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 333 reported | -208.9% | 38.1% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BCYC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 261M USD | 98 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 97 | 61 | |
| 3 | 356M AUD (≈$235M) | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 96 | 84 | |
| 280 | 332M USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 280 | 334M USD | 8 | 49 | |
| 280 | 303M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 287 | 271M USD | 7 | 14 | |
| 287 | 257M USD | 7 | 55 | |
| 287 | 475M USD | 7 | 22 | |
| 287 | 158M USD | 7 | 14 | |
| 291 | 13.0B TWD (≈$402M) | 6 | 49 | |
| 291 | 1.1B HKD (≈$141M) | 6 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score