Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BCE · against 54 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #42 of 55 · scores higher than 24% of peers · safety percentile 19
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including BCE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BCE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 54 reported | 1.73× | 0.66× | 21% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 56 reported | 0.65 | 0.67 | 51% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 55 reported | 0.73× | 1.06× | 28% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2.12T JPY (≈$14.4B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.54T JPY (≈$24.1B) | 90 | 77 | |
| 4 | 18.5B USD | 88 | 81 | |
| 5 | 10.6B EUR (≈$11.6B) | 82 | 32 | |
| 38 | 387.7B ZAR (≈$21.3B) | 27 | 68 | |
| 39 | 192.8B SEK (≈$19.3B) | 24 | 37 | |
| 40 | 10.4B USD | 24 | 59 | |
| 41 | 91.9B HKD (≈$11.8B) | 23 | 48 | |
| 42 | 19.2B USD | 19 | 67 | |
| 43 | 16.3B EUR (≈$17.9B) | 19 | 51 | |
| 44 | 10.9B USD | 19 | 31 | |
| 45 | 18.8B EUR (≈$20.7B) | 19 | 36 | |
| 46 | 14.0B USD | 17 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score