Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Brunswick Corporation
How Brunswick Corporation stacks up
BC · against 289 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
13/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #275 of 290 · scores higher than 5% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score6 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including BC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 13?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 89% of peers. Return on assets: -1.6% vs peer median 3.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 85% of peers. Operating margin: -0.4% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 83% of peers. Return on invested capital: -0.4% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 277 reported | -0.4% | 10.2% | 7% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 290 reported | -0.4% | 9.2% | 5% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 273 reported | -1.6% | 4.6% | 5% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 261 reported | -4.8% | 12.3% | 7% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 292 reported | 25.9% | 31.4% | 44% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BCScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score