Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
How Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. stacks up
BATRA · against 103 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
11/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #102 of 104 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including BATRA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 11?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -4.3% vs peer median 7.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 80% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.3% vs peer median 8.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.8% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BATRA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BATRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 103 reported | -1.8% | 3.3% | 14% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 106 reported | 0.9% | 7.8% | 7% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | -2.6% | 6.2% | 18% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 101 reported | 14.2% | 43.8% | 15% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BATRA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 2 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 4 | 166.5B TRY (≈$5.0B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 44.34T IDR (≈$2.7B) | 92 | 58 | |
| 98 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 15 | 23 | |
| 98 | 5.2B USD | 15 | ||
| 100 | 46.5B CNY (≈$6.5B) | 14 | 42 | |
| 101 | 6.61T KRW (≈$4.8B) | 13 | 44 | |
| 102 | 3.6B USD | 11 | 22 | |
| 103 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 2 | 65 | |
| 104 | 2.5B USD | 0 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score