Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BAP · against 120 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 121 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score20 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including BAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on equity and return on assets, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | BAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 94 reported | Not reported | 11.2% | — | — | Context only |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 9 reported | Not reported | 19.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 121 reported | 2.6% | 1.3% | 79% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 121 reported | 20.4% | 13.9% | 84% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 125 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 536.3B ZAR (≈$29.5B) | 98 | 54 | |
| 1 | 24.3B AUD (≈$16.0B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 4 | 11.6B GBP (≈$15.0B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 5 | 28.3B USD | 96 | 85 | |
| 22 | 16.7B EUR (≈$18.3B) | 84 | 51 | |
| 23 | 6.26T JPY (≈$42.6B) | 83 | 68 | |
| 23 | 14.6B USD | 83 | 64 | |
| 23 | 96.4B DKK (≈$14.5B) | 83 | 48 | |
| 26 | 27.9B USD | 82 | 51 | |
| 27 | 23.5B USD | 81 | 60 | |
| 28 | 20.98T KRW (≈$15.1B) | 80 | ||
| 28 | 15.3B EUR (≈$16.9B) | 80 | 38 | |
| 28 | 15.2B USD | 80 | 85 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score