Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Azenta, Inc.
How Azenta, Inc. stacks up
AZTA · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
28/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #358 of 455 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score34 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including AZTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- The loss per share widened. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.9% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.9% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AZTA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AZTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 4.9% | 11.0% | 34% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | Not reported | 21.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | -0.9% | 11.0% | 18% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AZTA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 352 | 60M USD | 29 | 33 | |
| 352 | 18.2B USD | 29 | 40 | |
| 352 | 1.7B USD | 29 | 30 | |
| 358 | 2.8B USD | 28 | 33 | |
| 358 | 1.6B USD | 28 | 33 | |
| 358 | 8.6B USD | 28 | 30 | |
| 358 | 1.4B USD | 28 | 42 | |
| 358 | 11.9B USD | 28 | 53 | |
| 363 | 36.0B USD | 27 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score