Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AXSM · against 202 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #160 of 203 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score44 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including AXSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | AXSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 200 reported | -2.7% | 2.4% | 18% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 202 reported | -2.4% | 4.6% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 121 reported | -1.0% | 1.1% | 36% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 201 reported | 1.1% | 22.1% | 6% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 3 | 89.5B HKD (≈$11.5B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 4 | 10.4B USD | 96 | 64 | |
| 5 | 80.2B CNY (≈$11.2B) | 95 | 76 | |
| 160 | 4.1B USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 160 | 3.7B USD | 8 | 31 | |
| 160 | 10.2B USD | 8 | ||
| 160 | 8.4B USD | 8 | 28 | |
| 160 | 7.3B USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 160 | 14.5B USD | 8 | 30 | |
| 160 | 5.7B USD | 8 | 52 | |
| 160 | 5.4B USD | 8 | 38 | |
| 160 | 9.0B USD | 8 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score