Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
1 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including AXG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on assets and return on equity, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -26.2% vs peer median 1.2%
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on equity: -89.1% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AXG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
AXG
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1 reported
54.9%
54.9%
—
—
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 1 reported
-46.2%
-46.2%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 1 reported
-26.2%
-26.2%
—
—
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 1 reported
-89.1%
-89.1%
—
—
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 1 reported
98.2%
98.2%
—
—
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
