Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AWR · against 103 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #40 of 104 · scores higher than 62% of peers · safety percentile 58
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including AWR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 104 reported | 0.82× | 1.21× | 74% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 101 reported | 0.55 | 0.41 | 37% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 101 reported | 0.98× | 1.08× | 45% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 2 | 2.70T CLP (≈$3.0B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 3 | 13.4B BRL (≈$2.4B) | 95 | 94 | |
| 4 | 1.6B EUR (≈$1.8B) | 94 | 65 | |
| 5 | 14.6B BRL (≈$2.6B) | 93 | 88 | |
| 36 | 10.7B BRL (≈$1.9B) | 65 | 82 | |
| 37 | 962.3B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 63 | 50 | |
| 38 | 4.1B USD | 63 | 43 | |
| 39 | 5.3B EUR (≈$5.9B) | 62 | 45 | |
| 40 | 3.4B USD | 58 | 63 | |
| 41 | 5.9B USD | 58 | 73 | |
| 42 | 4.5B NZD (≈$2.7B) | 58 | 67 | |
| 43 | 6.7B USD | 58 | 59 | |
| 44 | 3.2B EUR (≈$3.5B) | 57 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score