How Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. stacks up

AVTX · against 404 other Healthcare companies of similar size

Overall

33/ 100

Near the bottom of its peers.

Ranked #303 of 405 · scores higher than 24% of peers

Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the overall score

72 peers with an overall score of 30–39, including AVTX · Click a bar to see the companies

The four scores behind it

Overall = average of valuation, growth, profitability and safety percentile (categories without data are skipped)

Valuation#224 of 408Score 33 / 100 · beats 42%Growth#362 of 366Score 0 / 100 · beats 0%Profitability#386 of 407Score 5 / 100 · beats 4%Risk#25 of 420Lower relative risk · safety 96 · beats 94%

Ranking by overall score

Top 5 and the companies ranked around AVTX

Rank	Company	Market cap	Overall	Valuation	Growth	Profitability	Risk
1	Arbutus Biopharma CorporationABUS · US-listed	595M USD	97	96	98	99	0 / 2
1	Q32 Bio Inc.QTTB · US-listed	261M USD	97	93	—	98	0 / 2
3	Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.ZVRA · US-listed	609M USD	91	95	99	99	0 / 2
4	Beijing Chunlizhengda Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.1858.HK · Hong Kong	2.9B HKD (≈$365M)	84	99	63	86	0 / 2
5	CorMedix Inc.CRMD · US-listed	433M USD	81	96	99	99	2 / 2
⋯
303	Realcan Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.002589.SZ · China	4.2B CNY (≈$590M)	33	52	14	40	2 / 2
303	Contec Medical Systems Co.,Ltd300869.SZ · China	4.0B CNY (≈$561M)	33	0	13	30	0 / 2
303	Guizhou Sanli Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd603439.SS · China	4.4B CNY (≈$612M)	33	42	13	46	2 / 2
303	AgomAb Therapeutics NVAGMB · US-listed	337M USD	33	0	—	12	0 / 2
303	Avalo Therapeutics, Inc.AVTX · US-listed	389M USD	33	33	0	5	0 / 2
303	Cerus CorporationCERS · US-listed	472M USD	33	29	59	34	2 / 2
303	DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc.DMAC · US-listed	539M USD	33	8	—	11	0 / 2
303	Glass House Brands Inc.GLAS · US-listed	221M USD	33	8	62	28	2 / 2
311	CapsoVision, Inc.CV · US-listed	357M USD	32	8	38	8	0 / 2

Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…