Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Avnet, Inc.
How Avnet, Inc. stacks up
AVT · against 274 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #110 of 275 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including AVT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.4% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 72% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 41.6% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 82% of peers. Revenue growth: 24.5% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AVT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AVT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 277 reported | 24.5% | 12.0% | 79% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 207 reported | 41.6% | 18.2% | 67% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 272 reported | 1.4% | 8.5% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AVT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 3 | 3.8B USD | 99 | 74 | |
| 107 | 6.5B USD | 69 | 66 | |
| 110 | 46.2B CNY (≈$6.5B) | 68 | 45 | |
| 110 | 28.9B HKD (≈$3.7B) | 68 | 41 | |
| 110 | 39.1B CNY (≈$5.5B) | 68 | 60 | |
| 110 | 7.3B USD | 68 | 50 | |
| 110 | 5.6B USD | 68 | 66 | |
| 110 | 7.4B USD | 68 | 36 | |
| 116 | 31.1B HKD (≈$4.0B) | 67 | 59 | |
| 116 | 9.5B USD | 67 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score