Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Anteris Technologies Global Corp.
How Anteris Technologies Global Corp. stacks up
AVR · against 471 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #304 of 472 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score169 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including AVR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -19.0% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -35.3% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -16.2% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AVR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AVR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 458 reported | -34.8% | 0.5% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 477 reported | -35.7% | 3.5% | 8% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 203 reported | -16.2% | -5.5% | 29% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 46.1% | 47.5% | 49% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AVR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.50T IDR (≈$403M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 304 | 782M USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 304 | 647M USD | 8 | 40 | |
| 304 | 377M USD | 8 | 29 | |
| 304 | 334M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 304 | 546M USD | 8 | 31 | |
| 304 | 815M USD | 8 | 53 | |
| 304 | 593M USD | 8 | 40 | |
| 304 | 293M USD | 8 | ||
| 304 | 675M USD | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score