Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
How Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. stacks up
AVIR · against 383 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #236 of 384 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score149 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including AVIR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -158.4% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -49.3% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -45.5% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AVIR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AVIR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 367 reported | -49.9% | -0.4% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 387 reported | -158.4% | 1.9% | 4% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | -45.5% | -9.3% | 10% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 376 reported | 61.0% | 50.5% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AVIR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 236 | 487M USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 236 | 271M USD | 8 | 14 | |
| 236 | 647M USD | 8 | 40 | |
| 236 | 377M USD | 8 | 29 | |
| 236 | 334M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 236 | 546M USD | 8 | 31 | |
| 236 | 593M USD | 8 | 40 | |
| 236 | 222M USD | 8 | 31 | |
| 236 | 293M USD | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score