Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AVBC · against 192 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #140 of 193 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score28 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including AVBC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | AVBC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 177 reported | 7.9% | 8.7% | 47% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 34 reported | Not reported | 9.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 195 reported | 0.6% | 1.1% | 32% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 191 reported | 7.3% | 10.4% | 35% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 203 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 98.7B JPY (≈$671M) | 98 | 43 | |
| 2 | 447.9B KRW (≈$322M) | 97 | ||
| 2 | 289M USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 16.3B THB (≈$458M) | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 332M EUR (≈$365M) | 96 | 70 | |
| 137 | 857M AUD (≈$566M) | 19 | 23 | |
| 138 | 1.9B BRL (≈$341M) | 18 | ||
| 138 | 714M USD | 18 | 9 | |
| 140 | 109.2B JPY (≈$743M) | 17 | 59 | |
| 140 | 408M USD | 17 | 43 | |
| 140 | 14.3B THB (≈$400M) | 17 | 41 | |
| 143 | 6.0B HKD (≈$762M) | 16 | ||
| 143 | 51.3B JPY (≈$349M) | 16 | 35 | |
| 143 | 701M CHF (≈$806M) | 16 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score