Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Avista Corporation
How Avista Corporation stacks up
AVA · against 2 other Miscellaneous companies of similar size
Profitability
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #2 of 3 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score1 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including AVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Miscellaneous companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, which is stronger than most Miscellaneous peers.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.7% vs peer median 2.7%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 10.2% vs peer median 8.1%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 84% of peers. Operating margin: 18.8% vs peer median 7.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AVA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 3 reported | 10.2% | 18.4% | 0% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 7 reported | 18.8% | 12.5% | 83% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 3 reported | 2.7% | 2.7% | 50% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1 reported | Not reported | 18.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1 reported | Not reported | 67.8% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AVA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 387.9B INR (≈$4.7B) | 87 | 67 | |
| 2 | 3.2B USD | 64 | 45 | |
| 3 | 3.7B USD | 53 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score