Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ATS Corporation
How ATS Corporation stacks up
ATS · against 710 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #523 of 711 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score78 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including ATS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 66% of peers. Return on assets: 1.7% vs peer median 3.1%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 5.7% vs peer median 7.1%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 6.7% vs peer median 7.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 683 reported | 5.7% | 8.2% | 35% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 713 reported | 6.7% | 8.3% | 38% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 672 reported | 1.7% | 3.6% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 668 reported | 2.7% | 9.2% | 20% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 716 reported | 28.7% | 25.9% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATSScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score