Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ATRA · against 91 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #75 of 92 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 11
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ATRA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ATRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 79 reported | Not reported | 0.23× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 89 reported | 0.22 | 0.71 | 83% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 93 reported | 1.98× | 2.37× | 47% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B JPY (≈$57M) | 98 | ||
| 2 | 1.1B NOK (≈$105M) | 96 | 58 | |
| 3 | 111M USD | 96 | ||
| 4 | 83.4B KRW (≈$60M) | 93 | 36 | |
| 5 | 109M USD | 92 | 47 | |
| 71 | 105.7B KRW (≈$76M) | 16 | 37 | |
| 72 | 37M GBP (≈$48M) | 15 | ||
| 73 | 94M USD | 14 | 8 | |
| 74 | 124M USD | 14 | 31 | |
| 75 | 82M USD | 11 | 27 | |
| 76 | 648M HKD (≈$83M) | 11 | ||
| 77 | 3.0B THB (≈$83M) | 10 | 52 | |
| 78 | 10.8B JPY (≈$73M) | 7 | 27 | |
| 79 | 79M EUR (≈$87M) | 5 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score