Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AptarGroup, Inc.
How AptarGroup, Inc. stacks up
ATR · against 162 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #110 of 163 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ATR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 65% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -4.1% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.9% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 163 reported | 8.9% | 10.2% | 45% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 116 reported | -4.1% | 12.8% | 24% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 157 reported | 5.1% | 10.9% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 4 | 7.3B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 106 | 6.6B USD | 49 | 61 | |
| 108 | 83.0B CNY (≈$11.6B) | 48 | 62 | |
| 109 | 14.9B EUR (≈$16.4B) | 47 | 52 | |
| 110 | 1.30T JPY (≈$8.8B) | 46 | 71 | |
| 110 | 9.0B USD | 46 | 57 | |
| 110 | 22.3B SGD (≈$16.9B) | 46 | 57 | |
| 113 | 1.03T JPY (≈$7.0B) | 45 | 68 | |
| 113 | 33.1B CNY (≈$4.6B) | 45 | 66 | |
| 115 | 436.2B INR (≈$5.2B) | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score