Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ATO · against 54 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #22 of 55 · scores higher than 61% of peers · safety percentile 48
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including ATO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta and current ratio than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ATO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 55 reported | 0.68× | 1.47× | 85% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 54 reported | 0.57 | 0.46 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 53 reported | 0.81× | 0.91× | 38% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.3B EUR (≈$22.4B) | 91 | 42 | |
| 2 | 23.3B USD | 89 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2.24T JPY (≈$15.2B) | 86 | 55 | |
| 4 | 21.3B EUR (≈$23.4B) | 83 | 36 | |
| 5 | 179.3B DKK (≈$26.9B) | 83 | 53 | |
| 18 | 27.0B EUR (≈$29.7B) | 59 | 63 | |
| 19 | 39.9B USD | 56 | 54 | |
| 20 | 896.4B THB (≈$25.1B) | 50 | 44 | |
| 21 | 199.2B CNY (≈$27.9B) | 49 | 53 | |
| 22 | 29.4B USD | 48 | 57 | |
| 23 | 200.5B CNY (≈$28.1B) | 46 | 44 | |
| 24 | 76.7B MYR (≈$16.9B) | 45 | 58 | |
| 25 | 46.9B USD | 43 | 53 | |
| 26 | 19.4B EUR (≈$21.4B) | 42 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score