Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Atlanticus Holdings Corporation
How Atlanticus Holdings Corporation stacks up
ATLC · against 99 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Profitability
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #52 of 100 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score14 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including ATLC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on invested capital than most Financial Services peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 70% of peers. Return on invested capital: 2.8% vs peer median 6.3%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.0% vs peer median 2.6%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 61% of peers. Operating margin: 28.0% vs peer median 23.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATLC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATLC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 101 reported | 2.8% | 5.1% | 41% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 52 reported | 28.0% | 22.9% | 59% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 108 reported | 2.0% | 2.2% | 48% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 105 reported | 23.0% | 10.9% | 83% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 123 reported | 73.0% | 91.6% | 46% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATLC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.7B USD | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2.7B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 3 | 6.5B MYR (≈$1.4B) | 96 | 57 | |
| 3 | 21.21T IDR (≈$1.3B) | 96 | 93 | |
| 5 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 94 | 79 | |
| 48 | 706M USD | 48 | 52 | |
| 48 | 798M USD | 48 | 47 | |
| 50 | 994M USD | 47 | 51 | |
| 50 | 1.0B USD | 47 | 48 | |
| 52 | 1.4B USD | 42 | 58 | |
| 52 | 742M USD | 42 | 39 | |
| 52 | 1.1B USD | 42 | 37 | |
| 55 | 9.2B HKD (≈$1.2B) | 41 | 39 | |
| 56 | 36.3B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 40 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score