Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
How Alphatec Holdings, Inc. stacks up
ATEC · against 467 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
36/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #304 of 468 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score35 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including ATEC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -9.5% vs peer median 1.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 1.7% vs peer median 4.0%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 0.2% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATEC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATEC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 459 reported | -9.6% | 1.4% | 19% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 2.3% | 4.3% | 40% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 204 reported | -0.5% | -1.6% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 464 reported | -1.1% | 40.9% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATEC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.9B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 226.3B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 40.2B MXN (≈$2.2B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 299 | 1.2B SGD (≈$945M) | 37 | 35 | |
| 299 | 31.3B TRY (≈$938M) | 37 | 50 | |
| 299 | 1.2B USD | 37 | 49 | |
| 304 | 1.2B CHF (≈$1.4B) | 36 | 34 | |
| 304 | 1.2B USD | 36 | 36 | |
| 304 | 1.9B USD | 36 | 47 | |
| 307 | 642M USD | 33 | 46 | |
| 307 | 1.2B USD | 33 | ||
| 307 | 631M USD | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score