Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
How Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited stacks up
ATAT · against 294 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #153 of 295 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score37 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including ATAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.3% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 293 reported | 6.1% | 5.5% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 299 reported | 11.0% | 9.9% | 58% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 137 reported | 7.5% | 6.4% | 59% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 297 reported | 11.7% | 44.4% | 14% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 151 | 6.2B EUR (≈$6.8B) | 53 | 49 | |
| 153 | 1.27T JPY (≈$8.7B) | 52 | 63 | |
| 153 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 52 | 80 | |
| 153 | 45.4B CNY (≈$6.4B) | 52 | 71 | |
| 153 | 4.6B USD | 52 | 80 | |
| 153 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 52 | 55 | |
| 153 | 4.0B USD | 52 | 36 | |
| 159 | 52.0B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 51 | 41 | |
| 159 | 6.8B USD | 51 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score