Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ASX · against 54 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #45 of 55 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 17
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ASX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ASX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 53 reported | 0.87× | 0.39× | 19% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 54 reported | 1.52 | 1.16 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 54 reported | 1.16× | 1.67× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.16T JPY (≈$123.5B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 11.47T JPY (≈$78.0B) | 89 | 62 | |
| 3 | 65.3B USD | 83 | 68 | |
| 4 | 323.5B CNY (≈$45.3B) | 81 | 70 | |
| 5 | 9.04T INR (≈$108.5B) | 80 | 74 | |
| 41 | 95.8B USD | 21 | 67 | |
| 42 | 68.1B EUR (≈$74.9B) | 21 | 39 | |
| 43 | 61.6B USD | 19 | 38 | |
| 44 | 1.48T TWD (≈$45.9B) | 18 | 41 | |
| 45 | 86.2B USD | 17 | 37 | |
| 46 | 70.5B USD | 16 | 55 | |
| 47 | 72.9B CAD (≈$53.2B) | 15 | 51 | |
| 48 | 48.4B USD | 14 | 36 | |
| 49 | 52.7B USD | 12 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score