Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Algoma Steel Group Inc.
How Algoma Steel Group Inc. stacks up
ASTL · against 540 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #461 of 541 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score81 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including ASTL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -125.0% vs peer median 3.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -27.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -50.1% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ASTL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ASTL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 520 reported | Not reported | 2.4% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 551 reported | -27.8% | 7.4% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | -45.6% | 0.4% | 3% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 519 reported | Not reported | 70.1% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ASTL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 764M EUR (≈$840M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 1.9B MYR (≈$416M) | 99 | 81 | |
| 3 | 629.2B CLP (≈$692M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 3 | 768M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 461 | 2.4B CNY (≈$339M) | 8 | 38 | |
| 461 | 5.7B CNY (≈$797M) | 8 | 23 | |
| 461 | 25.8B TWD (≈$799M) | 8 | 33 | |
| 461 | 29.2B TWD (≈$906M) | 8 | 23 | |
| 461 | 562M USD | 8 | 6 | |
| 461 | 426M CAD (≈$311M) | 8 | ||
| 461 | 1.1B USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 461 | 926M USD | 8 | 8 | |
| 461 | 696M USD | 8 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score