Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Algoma Steel Group Inc.
How Algoma Steel Group Inc. stacks up
ASTL · against 539 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #529 of 540 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score55 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including ASTL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -46.5% vs peer median 2.5%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on invested capital: -116.7% vs peer median 6.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 98% of peers. Operating margin: -63.6% vs peer median 7.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ASTL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ASTL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 511 reported | -116.7% | 4.9% | 1% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 526 reported | -63.6% | 5.4% | 2% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 526 reported | -46.5% | 1.6% | 1% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 520 reported | -139.1% | 3.3% | 0% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 561 reported | -45.5% | 18.3% | 0% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ASTL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B MYR (≈$416M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 436M GBP (≈$566M) | 98 | 76 | |
| 1 | 934M AUD (≈$617M) | 98 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$673M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 1 | 635M USD | 98 | 79 | |
| 529 | 3.2B CNY (≈$455M) | 0 | 11 | |
| 529 | 4.4B CNY (≈$613M) | 0 | 34 | |
| 529 | 420M USD | 0 | 61 | |
| 529 | 412M USD | 0 | 21 | |
| 529 | 562M USD | 0 | 6 | |
| 529 | 429M USD | 0 | 16 | |
| 529 | 294M USD | 0 | 37 | |
| 529 | 343M USD | 0 | 22 | |
| 529 | 577M USD | 0 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score