Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AdvanSix Inc.
How AdvanSix Inc. stacks up
ASIX · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
27/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #151 of 183 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including ASIX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -3.0% vs peer median -0.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 3.4%
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ASIX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ASIX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 3.0% | 9.9% | 31% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | 11.1% | 17.1% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | -3.0% | 1.5% | 31% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ASIX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 147 | 69.7B USD | 31 | 19 | |
| 148 | 412M USD | 30 | 21 | |
| 148 | 2.0B USD | 30 | 23 | |
| 148 | 3.6B USD | 30 | 43 | |
| 151 | 421M USD | 27 | 25 | |
| 151 | 8.1B USD | 27 | 19 | |
| 151 | 24.4B USD | 27 | 28 | |
| 151 | 912M USD | 27 | 25 | |
| 155 | 310M USD | 24 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score