Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Asana, Inc.
How Asana, Inc. stacks up
ASAN · against 435 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #350 of 436 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including ASAN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -4.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.0% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.8% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ASAN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ASAN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 431 reported | -5.9% | 2.4% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 440 reported | -4.4% | 4.5% | 3% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 176 reported | 4.4% | 3.4% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 433 reported | 4.1% | 29.9% | 3% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ASAN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 344 | 2.6B CHF (≈$3.0B) | 25 | 31 | |
| 344 | 1.4B USD | 25 | 35 | |
| 344 | 35.4B NOK (≈$3.4B) | 25 | 50 | |
| 350 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 24 | 35 | |
| 350 | 2.6B USD | 24 | 24 | |
| 350 | 2.0B USD | 24 | 22 | |
| 350 | 4.5B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 24 | 23 | |
| 354 | 11.6B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 23 | 30 | |
| 354 | 1.4B USD | 23 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score