Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Amer Sports, Inc.
How Amer Sports, Inc. stacks up
AS · against 127 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
99/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 128 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including AS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 99?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 91% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 22.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 93% of peers. Revenue growth: 26.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 98% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 484.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 128 reported | 26.7% | 8.4% | 88% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 113 reported | 484.4% | 9.9% | 97% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 127 reported | 22.5% | 10.1% | 86% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 6 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 97 | 75 | |
| 6 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 97 | 96 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score