Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Artesian Resources Corporation
How Artesian Resources Corporation stacks up
ARTNA · against 75 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #35 of 76 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including ARTNA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.A mix: stronger earnings yield, but weaker free cash flow yield than most Utilities peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -5.2% vs peer median 0.0%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.3% vs peer median 8.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.8% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARTNA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARTNA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 76 reported | 6.8% | 3.8% | 64% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 75 reported | 9.8% | 8.0% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 31 reported | -6.8% | 0.1% | 37% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 76 reported | 73.5% | 103.4% | 36% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARTNA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 2 | 460M SGD (≈$350M) | 98 | 73 | |
| 2 | 40.2B JPY (≈$273M) | 98 | 61 | |
| 4 | 75.9B JPY (≈$516M) | 95 | 73 | |
| 4 | 3.7B BRL (≈$668M) | 95 | 75 | |
| 31 | 2.9B CNY (≈$409M) | 56 | 34 | |
| 31 | 493.8B CLP (≈$543M) | 56 | 66 | |
| 33 | 463M EUR (≈$510M) | 53 | 33 | |
| 34 | 100.3B JPY (≈$682M) | 51 | 40 | |
| 35 | 349M USD | 50 | 60 | |
| 35 | 440M USD | 50 | 76 | |
| 37 | 502M USD | 49 | 42 | |
| 38 | 575.4B CLP (≈$633M) | 48 | 46 | |
| 39 | 12.6B TWD (≈$389M) | 45 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score