Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Arqit Quantum Inc.
How Arqit Quantum Inc. stacks up
ARQQ · against 362 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #271 of 363 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including ARQQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -8.6% vs peer median 2.7%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -22.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -10.2% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARQQ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARQQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 348 reported | -21.4% | 1.6% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | -22.6% | 4.1% | 5% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 134 reported | Not reported | 1.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 353 reported | 11.5% | 46.6% | 9% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARQQ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 271 | 10.1B TWD (≈$312M) | 10 | 13 | |
| 271 | 11.7B TWD (≈$364M) | 10 | 10 | |
| 271 | 8.1B TWD (≈$251M) | 10 | 34 | |
| 271 | 170M USD | 10 | 5 | |
| 271 | 261M USD | 10 | 30 | |
| 271 | 200M USD | 10 | 32 | |
| 271 | 210M USD | 10 | 30 | |
| 271 | 454M USD | 10 | 13 | |
| 271 | 146M USD | 10 | 9 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score