Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Aramark
How Aramark stacks up
ARMK · against 255 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #159 of 256 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score51 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ARMK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARMK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARMK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 244 reported | 2.6% | 3.9% | 19% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 256 reported | 7.1% | 7.0% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 128 reported | 3.0% | 3.8% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 241 reported | 23.6% | 29.1% | 41% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARMK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 82.6B NOK (≈$7.8B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 2 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 4 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 4 | 91.3B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 154 | 1.94T INR (≈$23.3B) | 44 | 43 | |
| 154 | 8.2B USD | 44 | 61 | |
| 154 | 17.1B USD | 44 | 42 | |
| 159 | 11.2B EUR (≈$12.3B) | 43 | 44 | |
| 159 | 14.4B USD | 43 | 40 | |
| 159 | 15.9B USD | 43 | 50 | |
| 159 | 25.6B USD | 43 | 50 | |
| 163 | 4.15T JPY (≈$28.2B) | 42 | 50 | |
| 163 | 224.6B SEK (≈$22.5B) | 42 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score